Question: The EAR that states that the person who files the EEI to the AES must be in the US at the time of the filing. How are exporters interpreting this when they use a shipment such as GTS that is connected to AES? Assuming the company who is the filer of record is […]
Question: We have an internal dispute: Would a regular calendar be “not subject” to the EAR, or subject and classified EAR99? 734.3(b)(2) lists specific exclusions – calendars not listed. “Items” include “commodities”, which is an “article” – is a calendar an article and hence EAR99? ========== Answers: All commodities/articles are subject to the EAR (unless […]
Question: I am looking for a consolidated list of the biological agents that are considered dual-use by the US (on the CCL) as well as by the EU, specifically the UK. There is much overlap but I’m not sure that they are identical. Have any members consolidated the two lists and if so, would […]
Question: Can someone explain how to apply the EAR definition of “Technology” (772) and the general technology note (774) to EAR99 stuff? The EAR definition of “required” doesn’t seem to be able to be applied to an EAR99 item like it can be to a listed item. So if I have an EAR99 item, say […]
Question: My company has an “End item” that is classified with an ECCN controlled for AT reasons. However, the end item has a component that is classified at a higher control, for MT & AT reasons. The End Item is in need of repair and the part required to fix it, is the part that […]
Question: Some ECCN entries within the EAR CCL simply reference “TECHNOLOGY” (ex. 4E980), and others reference “TECHNOLOGY” ACCORDING TO THE GENERAL TECHNOLOGY NOTE (ex. 3E102). What is the distinction here between the use of plain “technology” vs “technology” in reference to the general technology note? ************ ANSWER: Basically there is no distinction being made, you’re […]
Question: Here’s a scenario: Company ABC designs/develops an EAR99 product in the U.S. ABC’s factory in China uses the U.S. technology to make the product, and deliveries are made directly from China to customers in various countries. One of ABC’s customers is a South Korean company (an OEM with no U.S. ties whatsoever). This customer […]
Question: If I have an item that falls under EAR99 classification, when is a license required? Does it only require a license if it’s being shipped to one of the five debarred countries? *********** ANSWERS: No, check out the Entity List in the EAR *********** In addition to the prohibited destinations, you will need a […]
Question: If I have an item that falls under EAR99 classification, when is a license required? Does it only require a license if it’s being shipped to one of the five debarred countries? ********** Add’l Answer: No – you need to also check the name of the person you are sending it to – if they […]
Question: How are companies managing the requirement to log technical data exports under the EAR? Are you logging the export of technical data for everything; everything except EAR99 technical data; or only licensed technical data under the EAR? ========== Answer: Not sure what requirement you are referring to? Are you thinking of the 762 recordkeeping […]
Question: We manufacture electronic equipment that we have designated as EAR99. However, recently I was informed that some of our products with this designation contain MMIC power amplifiers. Do we need to make a classification determination based on the MMIC amplifier within the final product, or the final product performance and technical characteristics itself? ========== […]
Question: Our company builds products that are classified EAR99. There are some components that are controlled but usually just for AT. Also, the controlled components are available to the general public for purchase. My question is regarding plant tours. We are trying to decide if it is necessary to screen all individuals that we are […]
