• 9801 claim

    QUESTION: Can we claim 9801 with the part number change?  It is the same part, but just put through testing.  If so, what do we use for back up?  The foreign shippers dec would show part 556, but the certificate of origin from the supplier will show part 555 which is a contradiction. ========== Answers: […]

  • 9801 Foreign Articles Exported and Returned w/o Advance in Value

    QUESTION: Is it possible to re-import items duty free, that are foreign made items purchased from our suppliers – which we exported to a foreign location and now the foreign party wants to return them to us for credit?  We were not the original importer into the U.S.  Can we avoid duty using proof of […]

  • 9801 SHIPPERS DEC OWNERSHIP

    QUESTION: When claiming 9801 on goods returning to the US,  a foreign shipper’s declaration is required.   Where in your organization does the responsibility lie in obtaining this declaration,  does it reside in the RMA process?   Is it a contractual requirement outlined in the contract with your customer?   Or does the import personnel […]

  • SUBSTANTIATING 9801 CLAIM TRAINING

    QUESTION: 19 CFR part 10.1 and 10.8 outline the declaration requirements for domestic goods returning or goods returning after repair/alterations. These requirements have always been in place,  however not highly enforced by CBP (in my experience)   CBP in some ports is starting to enforce these requirements for the declarations when using 9801 or 9802. […]

  • 9801 VS 9803

    QUESTION: We have reusable plastic containers and trays that are shipped to and fro.  They are not individually labeled or tracked nor do we wish to do so.  However, the duties were harsh and our broker recommended using 9801 (specifically 9801.00.1010) instead of 9803 (which we had briefly considered, but decided it was way too […]

  • RETURNED GOODS FROM CANADA TO US

    QUESTION: Our company is an NRI in Canada, with a 3PL handling our distribution in Toronto.  Each month, we have a large number of product that is returned to our DC in the US.   These products are US goods, produced by our company in the US.    They are not advanced in production, damaged, […]

  • NEW 9801.00.10 US Goods Returned REGULATIONS

    QUESTION: With the new regulations under 9801.00.10, I’d like to ask the membership what issues they’ve been experiencing at different Customs ports throughout US and what documents CBP has been requesting **************** Answers: Our express broker which uses any one of multiple ports for clearance (ex: Memphis, Anchorage, Newark) requests Manufacturer’s Affidavits and Foreign Shipper’s […]

  • NON-US ORIGIN 9801 CLAIMS

    QUESTION: Has anyone in the membership tried to enter a non-US origin good under 9801.00.10? This language makes it seem possible:  “or any other products when returned within 3 years after having been exported.” What kind of proof have you had to produce?  Export commercial invoice, AWB, ITN, etc?  Any affidavits? ************** Answers: The phrase […]

  • 9801 CLAIMS-addt’l answers

    Question: I’m trying to find out the risks involved in entering goods under 9801.00.10 that were temporarily exported not advanced in value…. that are most probably U.S. Origin but do not have documentation proving U.S. Origin. Most of the parts are duty free per a Special Tariff Treatment. Many of the parts are old, beginning […]

  • 9801 CLAIMS

    Question: I’m trying to find out the risks involved in entering goods under 9801.00.10 that were temporarily exported not advanced in value…. that are most probably U.S. Origin but do not have documentation proving U.S. Origin. Most of the parts are duty free per a Special Tariff Treatment. Many of the parts are old, beginning […]

  • 9801.00.10 and statistical tariff reporting

    Question:A couple of the US ports of entry are requesting a statistical tariff beused on any filing of a 9801.00.10 entry.  Per Chapter 98’s statisticalnote 2, the rate of duty is derived from the statistical reportingnumber as with the 9802.00.4040 example provided.  However, if9801.00.10 is duty free, on what basis are the ports requesting thesecond […]